McNeese State
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
370  Enrique Soto SR 32:35
404  Nathan Jones SR 32:39
656  Oliver James SR 33:07
896  Brian Flanagan FR 33:30
965  William Hamilton SR 33:35
1,216  Niall Holt JR 33:56
1,621  Daniel Saina FR 34:29
1,752  Luke Horgan FR 34:42
National Rank #103 of 315
South Central Region Rank #6 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 4th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 75.8%
Top 10 in Regional 99.4%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Enrique Soto Nathan Jones Oliver James Brian Flanagan William Hamilton Niall Holt Daniel Saina Luke Horgan
Texas A&M Invitational 09/23 1045 32:46 32:36 33:34 33:12 33:32 33:54 34:23 34:24
Princeton Invitational 10/14 1031 32:14 32:53 33:36 33:27 33:47
Southland Conference 10/27 1075 32:57 32:45 33:19 33:40 33:31 33:49 34:46 34:59
South Region Championships 11/10 937 32:22 32:02 32:50 33:31 34:02 34:29 34:20





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 4.9 196 9.0 45.9 20.9 11.3 6.3 3.4 2.0 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Enrique Soto 6.9% 186.0
Nathan Jones 3.7% 199.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Enrique Soto 19.7 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 1.1 1.3 1.8 2.9 3.4 3.2 5.4 5.0 5.7 5.0 6.4 4.6 5.7 5.0 5.1 4.4 3.8 3.2
Nathan Jones 21.3 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.9 1.7 2.3 3.4 3.0 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.7 5.5 5.5 6.2 4.5 5.1 4.2 4.5
Oliver James 34.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 1.1 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.4 2.8
Brian Flanagan 51.8
William Hamilton 56.5
Niall Holt 74.7
Daniel Saina 107.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 9.0% 9.0 3
4 45.9% 45.9 4
5 20.9% 20.9 5
6 11.3% 11.3 6
7 6.3% 6.3 7
8 3.4% 3.4 8
9 2.0% 2.0 9
10 0.9% 0.9 10
11 0.3% 0.3 11
12 0.2% 0.2 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Lipscomb 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0